Carrie Symonds, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s girlfriend, has reportedly been denied a visa to the United States for having traveled to Somaliland. It’s a sin with which I’m familiar, having visited Somaliland twice, including earlier this month. I certainly will go again in the coming year.
Be the first to know – Follow us on @Saxafi
The root of the problem is not Somaliland, but Somalia. In the late 19th and early 20th century, Somaliland was a British protectorate. The United Kingdom gave it full independence in 1960, and every member of the UN Security Council (including the United States) recognized Somaliland as an independent country. In a fit of nationalist euphoria, however, some Somaliland authorities entered into a voluntary union with the former Italian colony, and together they became Somalia.
Somalia then became both a dictatorship and an increasingly dysfunctional state. At first a Soviet Cold War ally, it flipped in the late 1970s to become an American proxy. In the late 1980s, dictator Siyad Barre launched a campaign of genocide against Somaliland, destroying over 85% of its capital Hargeisa; local authorities are still exhuming mass graves today. Siyad Barre eventually drove Somalia over the brink into state failure and anarchy.
As Somalia descended into chaos, Somaliland declared its independence and built a functional, democratic government. Today, Somaliland controls around 50,000 square miles; despite billions of dollars of U.S. and international aid invested into Somalia’s government, the president and prime minister in Mogadishu control only around 50,000 square feet. (For those interested, Mark Bradbury wrote the definitive history of Somaliland and its reemergence as an entity a decade ago).
Symonds supposedly visited Somaliland last year with her friend, a campaigner against female genital mutilation. That’s a noble cause, one which Somaliland’s former foreign minister (Mrs.) Edna Adan has long championed. Edna’s hospital, built over a former killing field, now attracts women and children from across Eastern Africa. During my first visit to Somaliland, public service billboards sought to educate the population both on the risks of female genital mutilation and the fact that there was no religious basis to the practice.
Symonds reportedly was heading to an environmental conference in the United States when consular officials nixed her trip. Somaliland also happens to be a regional environmental leader, at the helm against both charcoaling and smuggling of wildlife such as cheetahs and tortoises. (Somaliland’s environment minister also happens to be a woman, as the region implements equality rather than simply treating a commitment to feminism as a rhetorical tool to trot out for credulous Western diplomats).
Somaliland is also pro-Western in its outlook. The Abaarso School has taken children, including orphans, from around Somaliland and Somalia and offered them an American-style curriculum. Many of its graduates now attend elite universities in the United States and Great Britain and are returning to rebuild Somaliland’s institutions (Abaarso founder Jonathan Starr has written a great memoir of the school’s founding and rise). While Russia and China covet Somaliland’s strategic location and resources, the Somaliland government has sought closer ties with the United States.
Why then would the State Department deny a visa to the partner of the prime minister of America’s closest ally just for having visited Somaliland? The answer lies first in former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s decision to vest all sovereignty in Somalia and Somaliland under the so-called Federal Government of Somalia. Clinton made the move against the backdrop of the Benghazi tragedy, as she sought to be able to show diplomatic progress elsewhere in Africa.
In effect, and with a wave of a magic diplomatic wand, Clinton sought to erase decades of self-governance, favoring a largely appointed and corrupt Mogadishu over Somaliland’s own popularly elected government. As with many diplomatic initiatives, when not grounded in reality, they have little effect. Somaliland continues to have its own president and parliament, its own armed forces, it trades in its own currency, and it boasts its own cellular phone network. While Somalia is a haven for terrorists and is too dangerous for even most Somalis to walk around without security, and while it remains the world’s most corrupt country, Somaliland remains peaceful and a place international companies like Coca Cola choose for commerce. While Somalia’s President Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed (“Farmajo”) claims broad authority, no Somali president has stepped foot in Somaliland for decades.
As far as the State Department is concerned, however, there is no difference between the regions. Donald Yamamoto, the current U.S. ambassador to Somalia, is a decades-long East Africa hand and is an architect of the State Department’s push to empower Mogadishu. It’s a policy which has failed by any reasonable metric and increasingly does U.S. national security harm. But perhaps because of pride or willful blindness, he refuses to concede its harm. Add into the mix President Trump’s travel ban: Somalia is on the list, and perhaps rightly so. But the State Department’s unwillingness to recognize that the difference between Somalia and Somaliland is as great as the difference between China and Taiwan is both divorced from reality and bad policy.
It’s time Secretary of State Mike Pompeo right the wrong. Sensitivity to Somalia’s nationalist feelings is no reason to actively waste American taxpayers, undermine America’s fight against terrorism, weaken America’s position vis-à-vis global rivals, smother the Horn of Africa’s most promising democracy, and now insult key U.S. allies like Great Britain.
It’s time to do the right thing. The State Department does not want to (re-)recognize Somaliland’s independence but, even absent such recognition, it could first open a consulate or shadow diplomatic office in Somaliland, much like those which exist in Iraqi Kurdistan and Taiwan and, then, remove Somaliland from the travel ban. To continue to consider Somaliland and Somalia one and the same, however, is pure idiocy, and one that as the Carrie Symonds saga demonstrates, compounds the hemorrhaging of America’s diplomatic reputation.
More reaction about the story of “Barring British Prime Minister’s Girlfriend From The US For A Somaliland Visit” #twitter
I have been visiting Somaliland regularly since I lived there in 1998. I encourage others to experience it as well. I also visit the US every year, only made possible by my US passport. #visitSomailand #Somaliland pic.twitter.com/G80eYM3cXB
— Prof Laura Hammond (@lhammondsoas) August 22, 2019
Not only is @realDonaldTrump utterly wrong with this policy – it’s an absurd and inaccurate claim from the @DailyMailUK – #Somaliland is NOT “war-torn” – I went there for a very successful visit with @LizMcInnes_MP @Offord4Hendon last year! It’s thriving + welcoming! @Gobannimo pic.twitter.com/vi0b8CsWFB
— Stephen Doughty MP / AS (@SDoughtyMP) August 21, 2019
Well, if everyone is going to reminisce about Somaliland I guess I'll join in. pic.twitter.com/pp1IJj4APO
— Nadifa Mohamed (@thesailorsgirl) August 22, 2019
I have been back and forth in #Somaliland for many years now and I have taken it as my personal duty to educate people about this wonderful place. Happy to extend the services to @DailyMailUK. #VisitSomaliland https://t.co/QRqwaDGAbt pic.twitter.com/HHXUiGCIcu
— Dr. Sarah Njeri (@sndeall) August 22, 2019
Ignore the front page of the Daily Fail (obvs!), #Somaliland is not 'war torn'. It's a wonderful (and viable) destination for visitors. I used to live there and I go back every year. Any questions about logistics, ask me. #visitSomaliland Some of my photos: pic.twitter.com/yyIRY5cGsZ
— Pete Chonka (@PeteChonka) August 22, 2019
The Trump administration is right about one thing: once you visit #Somaliland, you don't come back the same person. Instead you come back more aware of its beauty and charm. (Amoud University, Awdal, Somaliland) #VisitSomaliland pic.twitter.com/K1evDceePT
— Matthew Gordon (@matt_gordon36) August 22, 2019
— Mariam Robly (@MariamRobly) August 22, 2019
When someone asks would you go back to #Somaliland, I say YES!
— Maaza Mengiste (@MaazaMengiste) August 21, 2019
— Madhu Krishnan (@ProfMadhuK) August 21, 2019
Hearts afire for #Somaliland 🔥❤️
— Bhakti Shringarpure (@bhakti_shringa) August 22, 2019
Michael Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, where he researches Arab politics, the Gulf Cooperation Council, Iran, Iraq, the Kurds, terrorism, and Turkey. He concurrently teaches classes on terrorism for the FBI and on security, politics, religion, and history for US and NATO military units.
A former Pentagon official, Dr. Rubin has lived in post-revolution Iran, Yemen, and both pre- and postwar Iraq, and he spent time with the Taliban before 9/11. He is the author, co-author, and co-editor of several books exploring Iranian history, American diplomacy, Kurdish studies, and Shi’ite politics, including “Kurdistan Rising” (AEI Press, 2016), “Dancing with the Devil: The Perils of Engaging Rogue Regimes” (Encounter Books, 2014); and “Eternal Iran: Continuity and Chaos” (Palgrave, 2005).
Dr. Rubin has a Ph.D. and an M.A. in history from Yale University, where he also obtained a B.S. in biology.
Follow Michael Rubin on .