The Ethiopian government has been putting in a lot of overtime apologizing for a map of Africa on the official website of its Ministry of Foreign Affairs that erased some African countries. The since deleted map published last weekend, got the goat of many Africans on social media for what, at first glance, looked like extreme effrontery.

The Ethopian map of Africa co-opted Somalia as part of Ethiopian territory, although it retained the Republic of Somaliland. Then it merged the two Congos, calling them the Republic of Congo.


It erased South Sudan, going back to the Sudan as it was before the former’s independence in 2011.

The tiny kingdoms of eSwatini (former Swaziland) and Lesotho were disappeared. Equatorial Guinea was also history. The map might have been the effort of a shaky-handed Ethiopian cartographer who had drunk too much Bedele Special the previous night, but one hopes it was more likely the work of an overzealous Pan-Africanist mapmaker.

For a true Pan-Africanist would argue that the sin of the Ethiopian map of Africa is that it didn’t kill off and merge more African countries.

The reality is that even in 2019 there are still two opposed tendencies in the African state. Many states are smaller than they think they are, and several others are bigger than they imagine they are. Perhaps the most significant story of the year on Kenya, appeared early May in Daily Nation, and has probably been already forgotten. It told of Deputy President William Ruto flying over Lotikipi Plains when his eyes caught some isolated huts.

He had his helicopter land nearby, and he went to visit the collection of huts in the remote Nayane Aroo area. The villagers didn’t know he was. Also, they neither spoke English or Kiswahili, Kenya’s official languages. Be that as it may, while there are Kenyans in what is not too far away from Ruto’s Eldoret backyard that don’t know who he is, there are worldly people in small towns in Europe and North America who know him.

In that sense, Kenya is both smaller and bigger than it is. An African researcher doing work on conflict in the continent, not too long ago landed in the Lake Chad Basin, that volatile region shared by Cameroon, Chad, Niger and Nigeria.

As he tells the story, he came upon some peasants selling food on the roadside, so he decided – through an interpreter – to seek their opinion on the political and economic woes of the basin.

Totally by accident, his questions wandered to the wads of currency notes they were clutching in their fists. They were Nigerian Naira notes. The main peasant he spoke to knew it was money, but he didn’t know specifically that they were Nigerian Naira. He put it down to illiteracy, until he asked if he knew in which country he was. The chap didn’t know. They were in Niger.

The Nigerian Naira was the currency in that remote part Niger. He then asked if he could name any of the several countries neighbouring Niger (Nigeria, Benin, Burkina Faso, Algeria, Libya, Chad), and the fellow just gave him a blank stare.

His conclusion was that this was not just illiteracy. There simply was no consciousness among the peasants that their countries and the neighbouring ones existed as separate nations. They had local chiefs, though, but their authority was not based on territory, but other cultural and spiritual constructions.

Likewise, we’ve written before about the vexing issue of demarcating the border between Sudan and South Sudan. The good people at the African Union in Addis Ababa working on it tell an incredible story.

Say, on a Monday, they have a meeting in an air-conditioned boardroom with Sudanese and South Sudanese officials. They whip out and pore over the maps, lay rulers upon them, and agree on the latitudes and longitudes of the borderline. Well and good.

On the Friday, the teams assemble at the physical border, and bring out the map. “According to the latitudes and longitudes we agreed on on Monday, this is where the border line passes”, an AU official might say.

Ethiopia’s Bad Map Of Africa Was Good
Charles Onyango-Obbo

At that point, the whole thing goes haywire. “No, it is not”, a South Sudanese says, pointing to a point deep into (north) Sudan territory, “for over 150 years, we always knew that the border is at that hill, and our grandfathers, and great grandfathers, grazed their cattle in the valley”.

The author is publisher of and explainer Twitter@cobbo3



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.