WorldRemitAds

This article, “Politicizing the Skies: Somalia’s Airspace Crisis,” written by Safwaan Farah, an Aviation Safety Researcher, discusses the “airspace crisis” caused by Somalia’s politicization of East African airspace, particularly affecting travelers to Somaliland.

Here’s a breakdown:

  • The Problem: Somalia, since gaining control of the Mogadishu Flight Information Region (FIR) in 2018, is using airspace management for political leverage rather than focusing on safety and technical requirements. Specifically, Somalia requires travelers to Hargeisa, Somaliland to obtain a Somalia e-Visa in addition to the Somaliland visa, causing them to pay twice and potentially be stranded.

  • Safety Concerns: Somalia lacks operational control over the northern sector of the FIR (covering Somaliland) and cannot provide required Search and Rescue (SAR) services. This is a violation of international safety standards.

  • Violation of International Rules: The double visa requirement violates ICAO Annex 9, Chapters 3.5–3.6 which forbids redundant travel documents. Airlines enforcing the Somalia e-Visa are complicit in this political game.

  • Impact: This politicization undermines passenger rights, erodes trust in airlines and aviation governance, discourages travel and tourism, and compromises safety oversight.

  • Call to Action: The author urges ICAO and IATA to intervene by:

    • Reviewing Somalia’s technical compliance with FIR responsibilities.

    • Correcting misleading passenger-entry information in the IATA Timatic system.

    • Reaffirming that civil aviation should serve passengers safely and fairly, not enforce political agendas.

In essence, the article argues that Somalia is misusing its control over airspace to exert political pressure on Somaliland, at the expense of passenger safety, convenience, and international aviation regulations.

The complete piece is as follows:

Politicizing the Skies, Somalia’s Airspace CrisisPoliticizing the Skies: Somalia’s Airspace Crisis

In Somalia, airspace rules trap travelers and punish airlines, turning safety into political leverage.

By Safwaan Farah

Imagine arriving at an airport fully prepared for your trip, only to be told you cannot board because the country you’re flying to suddenly demands a visa you didn’t know existed, and you must pay twice for it. This is the reality for travelers to Hargeisa, Somaliland, caught in Somalia’s politicization of East African airspace.

Skies Held Hostage

Airspace management should be neutral, technical, and focused on safety. Yet since the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) handed control of the Mogadishu Flight Information Region (FIR) to Somalia in 2018, political agendas have replaced technical priorities.

SomlegalAds

Somalia lacks operational control over most of the FIR, particularly the northern sector covering Somaliland, and cannot provide Search and Rescue (SAR) services, which are required under ICAO Annex 12. Under Article 28 of the Chicago Convention, any State responsible for air-navigation services must maintain infrastructure for safe operations; communications, meteorology, and SAR. Somalia’s failure leaves vast northern airspace without proper emergency coverage, a serious breach of international safety standards.

Stranded

Travelers flying to Hargeisa now face a Kafkaesque ordeal. Even though Somaliland issues visas on arrival, airlines are requiring a Somalia e-Visa. Passengers are forced to pay $100 for Somalia and another $61 for Somaliland, stranded and frustrated in airports.

This isn’t just bureaucracy. It violates international aviation rules:

  • ICAO Annex 9, Chapters 3.5–3.6 forbids States from demanding redundant travel documents.
  • IATA Resolution 787 requires airlines to rely on accurate entry information in the IATA Timatic database.
  • ICAO Doc 9587 and IATA Global Passenger Standards protect travelers from arbitrary barriers, ensuring airlines cannot mislead passengers or impose unnecessary charges.

By enforcing Somalia’s e-Visa requirement on travelers destined for Somaliland, airlines are complicit in a political game, undermining passengers’ lawful right to travel.

Passenger Rights

Passengers are not just customers; they are the lifeblood of civil aviation. International rules exist precisely to protect them. ICAO Annex 9 (Facilitation) demands uniformity and predictability, while IATA standards ensure transparency and fairness. Arbitrary denials, redundant fees, or misinformation violate these protections, eroding trust in airlines and aviation governance.

The problem goes beyond inconvenience. Political interference in airspace management undermines the principles of safety, neutrality, and lawful facilitation that international aviation depends on. Every passenger stranded, delayed, or misinformed is a warning that these systems are being misused.

Safety and Stability in Peril

The consequences of politicized airspace extend beyond passenger frustration. Passenger confidence is falling. Delays, denied boardings, and double fees discourage travel and tourism. Airlines risk reputational damage. Furthermore, safety oversight is compromised. Decisions driven by politics rather than technical need leave northern airspace uncovered. Without a functioning SAR system, emergencies could have fatal outcomes. Aviation safety relies on coordination, capability, and infrastructure, not political assertion.

Immediate action by ICAO and IATA is essential. They should:

  • Review Somalia’s technical compliance with FIR responsibilities under Article 28 and Annexes 9 and 12.
  • Correct misleading passenger-entry information in the IATA Timatic system to prevent further denial-of-boarding incidents.
  • Reaffirm that civil aviation exists to serve passengers safely and fairly, not enforce political agendas, consistent with ICAO’s “No Country Left Behind (NCLB)” vision.

Air travel should connect people, not punish them. When administrative power is used to control passengers, the credibility of global aviation governance is at stake. Somalia’s politicization of Somaliland’s airspace and its double-visa policy violate ICAO’s core principles of neutrality, safety, and facilitation. Immediate intervention is needed from ICAO and IATA to protect passengers and restore lawful, apolitical management of East African skies.


Safwaan Farah

Aviation Safety Researcher


This article reflects the author’s views, not necessarily those of SaxafiMedia.